Go Back   Racing Nascar > The Starting Line > Owner/Driver's > Mayfield Vs. Nascar
Register Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2010   #1 (permalink)
Co-Administrator
 
Schwartz Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The flatlands...Where dirt is for farming, clay is for racin' and asphalt is for gettin there!!!
Posts: 10,294
Default Mayfield asks court to reconsider decision

Jeremy Mayfield asks court to reconsider decision to dismiss his claims against NASCAR
By Bob PockrassWednesday, June 16, 2010


Jeremy Mayfield is asking a U.S. District Court judge to reconsider his ruling that dismissed Mayfield’s claims against NASCAR over a May 2009 drug test that NASCAR said was positive for methamphetamines.

In May, Judge Graham Mullen dismissed Mayfield’s claims as he ruled that Mayfield had waived most of his rights to sue NASCAR when he signed the NASCAR-driver agreement and NASCAR-owner agreement. He also indicated that Mayfield did not have enough evidence to support his claims.

Mayfield’s legal team, headed by celebrity attorney Mark Geragos, filed a four-page motion Tuesday night asking Mullen to reconsider. Such motions are not uncommon, especially when an appeal is planned.

It states that Mullen erred by still allowing NASCAR to pursue its counterclaim against Mayfield (for breach of contract by competing while violating the substance-abuse policy) but not allowing Mayfield to sue NASCAR because of the waiver signed as part of the driver-NASCAR agreement. The motion also states that Mullen did not apply applicable Florida law and that Mayfield should have been given the opportunity to amend his complaint to bring claims of wrongful interference with contractual or business relations.

Mayfield, who was indefinitely suspended from NASCAR on May 9, 2009, had sued NASCAR for breach of contract, discrimination and defamation in an attempt to get back on the track and for financial damages. He won an injunction to participate in NASCAR last July but never got back on track.

The injunction was later stayed, pending appeal, and Mayfield – the only driver suspended since NASCAR implemented random drug testing in 2009 – eventually asked for the court to drop the injunction so the case could proceed more quickly toward trial. A trial was scheduled for September 2010 at the earliest.

The 40-year-old Mayfield, who has 433 career starts with five Cup victories and two Chase appearances, qualified for five of the first 11 races of the 2009 season before being suspended. He has denied using methamphetamines and contended the drug-test findings that prompted his suspension resulted from a combination of prescription drug Adderall, which is used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and over-the-counter Claritin-D allergy medicine. He also argued that NASCAR must follow guidelines that regulate federal agencies. NASCAR denied that Aegis Sciences Corp., which conducts the NASCAR drug-testing program, must follow those regulations, and Mullen agreed in his ruling in May.


Jeremy Mayfield asks court to reconsider decision to dismiss his claims against NASCAR | NASCAR News Now - SceneDaily.com
__________________
Schwartz Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010   #2 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Scooters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,470
Default

Give it up Jeremy. You might have a celebrity attorney but it sure looks like he doesn't do his homework. A simple hair follicle test all those months ago would have dispelled any doubts about your innocence. Now, nobody cares.
__________________
Have you ever felt like doing this to someone?
<b><font face=Comic Sans MS><font color=Purple>
</font></font></b>


Scooters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #4 (permalink)
Co-Administrator
 
Schwartz Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The flatlands...Where dirt is for farming, clay is for racin' and asphalt is for gettin there!!!
Posts: 10,294
Default

No surprise there...
__________________
Schwartz Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #5 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Scooters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,470
Default

All of this could have been laid to rest way back at the beginning; the only person benefiting here is the lawyer.
__________________
Have you ever felt like doing this to someone?
<b><font face=Comic Sans MS><font color=Purple>
</font></font></b>


Scooters is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
The administrators of this site (http://racingnascar.com) holds NO RESPONSIBILITY in any way and cannot be held responsible for what its users post, or any other actions of it. The administrators of this site (http://racingnascar.com) also hold NO RESPONSIBILITY for growth of hair in unusual locations, loss of sight of any kind or any repetitive strain injury caused while browsing this site. RacingNascar is not affiliated with or endorsed by Nascar.